A great photographer of life in all its forms Sebastião Salgado

His website is linked followed by a film on Youtube - you can also read a Guardian article by Andrei Netto you’ll find below

https://www.amazonasimages.com/sebastiao-salgado/

I photographed the world,” says Sebastião Salgado, flicking through the archive in his Paris studio. Salgado, who turns 80 this week, has witnessed wars, revolutions, coups, humanitarian crises, and famine. He has also seen some of the most pristine places on the planet – locations and peoples untouched by the devastating fury of the modern world.

His body of work, an instantly recognisable combination of black-and-white composition and dramatic lighting, has been built up over decades, covering hundreds of assignments in 130 countries and his name stands in the photojournalist pantheon alongside figures such as Robert Capa, Eugene Smith, Margaret Bourke-White, Henri Cartier-Bresson, James Nachtwey and Steve McCurry.

Now, Salgado tells the Guardian, it’s time to step down. “I know I won’t live much longer. But I don’t want to live much longer. I’ve lived so much and seen so many things.”

Although still strong and active – able to walk or cycle several kilometres a day – his body is paying the price for his years working in some of the world’s most hostile and challenging places.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2024/feb/08/photographer-sebastiao-salgado-at-80-they-say-i-was-an-aesthete-of-misery

The dangers of corporate media and the murder of Manuel Esteban Paez Terán

From the Watson Institute comes another well-research paper on the dangers of smearing activists with terrorism… this applies to environmental, animal rights activists all the way to people protesting Apartheid Israel. The entire paper can be found here - https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/2023/Cop%20City%20and%20Terrorism_.pdf

Why Media Conflation of Activism with Terrorism has Dire Consequences: The Case of Cop City

Summary

Deepa Kumar1
With Research Assistance by Mimi Healy

November 7, 2023

The aftermath of 9/11 witnessed the emergence of new laws and policies designed to police individuals regarded as "terrorists." While the popular perception of terrorism centered around Arabs, Muslims, and those who “look Muslim,” the U.S. national security apparatus quietly broadened its definition of terrorism to include peace activists, environmental justice activists, animal rights activists, Black Lives Matter activists and others. Counterterrorism resources have been used to infiltrate political organizations that “criticize business interests and government policies," according to the ACLU, despite a lack of evidence that the groups were either engaged in or intended to use violent action.2 For instance, anti-terrorism training was given to police officers in the lead up to the protests against the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2018.3 And the U.S. government labeled indigenous activists opposed to the pipeline as “extremists.”4

1 Deepa Kumar is Professor of Media Studies in the School of Communication and Information at Rutgers University. Email: dekumar@rutgers.edu. She wishes to thank Stephanie Savell for her close reading of the report and her extensive helpful feedback. Arun Kundnani, Catherine Lutz, Heidi Peltier and Neta Crawford also offered helpful suggestions. Last but not least, Mimi Healy spent a good deal of time helping with everything from the Lexis-Nexis search to fact checking.

2 FOIA requests filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in 2004 show that the FBI investigated peace activists, animal rights activists, lawyers groups and others. According to the ACLU, the FBI expanded its definition of “domestic terrorism” to include citizens participating in lawful protests or civil disobedience. Since then, various states have followed suit with state laws on terrorism that similarly target lawful protests. ACLU. (2005, December 20). New Documents Show FBI Targeting Environmental and Animal Rights Groups Activities as ‘Domestic Terrorism’. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/new-documents-show-fbi-targeting-environmental-and-animal-rights- groups-activities.
3 ACLU. (2018, September 4). FOIA Document – Government Email about “anti-terrorism training” ahead of Keystone XL Pipeline protests.https://www.aclu.org/documents/foia-document-government-email-about-anti-terrorism-training-ahead-ke ystone-xl-pipeline
4 Parrish, W.; Levin, S. (2018, September 20). ‘Treating protest as terrorism’: US plans crackdown on Keystone XL activists. The Guardian.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/20/keystone-pipeline-protest-activism-crackdown-s tanding-rock

1

This process of labeling activists as “terrorists” is taking place right now in Georgia. Since December 2022, dozens of activists opposed to the construction of a $90 million, 85-acre police training complex, colloquially known as “Cop City,” have been indicted as “domestic terrorists.” If convicted of these charges, they could face up to 35 years in prison, with a minimum sentence of five years.5

Georgia authorities claim that the protestors are violent and have attacked the police, terrorized the community, and destroyed property.6 Lawyers for those arrested contend that the charges are fabricated and that activists are being harshly penalized for civil disobedience.7 Human and Civil Rights groups have denounced Georgia’s use of terrorism laws, stating that they stifle lawful protests and erode First Amendment Rights; they have asked Georgia to drop the unfounded charges.8 Indeed, if such a law were in place in the 1960s, civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., born in Atlanta, might have been charged as a "terrorist" for his civil disobedience, potentially facing a lengthy prison sentence.

Alarmingly, Georgia has deployed state violence to squash the movement, even going so far as to kill an activist encamped in the forest. This is the first time in U.S. history that an environmental justice activist has been killed by law enforcement authorities.9 This action echoes the use of violence against the Standing Rock movement in North Dakota in 2016, where over 300 protestors were injured by the police.10 While the police have faced no charges, an activist was sentenced to six years in jail on the grounds of “domestic terrorism” for damaging the Dakota Access Pipeline.11 This conflation of property damage with terrorism sets a dangerous precedent. Georgia expanded its definition of terrorism to include property destruction in 2017 and is using this law to prosecute activists.

5 Carr, C. (2023, March 3). Letter Calling for Dropping of Domestic Terrorism Charges Against Defend the Atlanta Forest Activists. Human Rights Campaign. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/03/03/letter-calling-dropping-domestic-terrorism-charges-against-defen d-atlanta-forest

6 Among those indicted is a lawyer for the Southern Poverty Law Center who was at the protests as a legal observer. Southern Poverty Law Center. (2023, March 6). NLG and SPLC Statements on Arrest of Legal Observer. https://www.splcenter.org/presscenter/nlg-and-splc-statements-arrest-legal-observer
7 Among those arrested and charged with terrorism is a lawyer who works for Southern Poverty Law Center who was at the protests as a legal observer on behalf of the National Lawyers Guild.

8 Carr, C. (2023, March 3). Letter Calling for Dropping of Domestic Terrorism Charges Against Defend the Atlanta Forest Activists. Human Rights Campaign. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/03/03/letter-calling-dropping-domestic-terrorism-charges-against-defen d-atlanta-forest#:~:text=If %20successfully%20prosecuted%2C%20these%20domestic,and%20chill%20free %20speech%20activities.

9 Shahshahani, A. (2023, September 15). Cop Cities in a Militarized World. Boston Review. https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/cop-cities-in-a-militarized-world/
10 Dakwar, J. (2016, November 22). Police at Standing Rock Are Using Life-Threatening Crowd-Control Weapons to Crack Down on Water Protectors. ACLU. https://www.aclu.org/news/racial-justice/police-standing-rock-are-using-life-threatening-crowd
11 United States Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Iowa. (2022, September 23). Arizona Woman Sentenced to Six Years in Prison for Conspiracy to Damage the Dakota Access Pipeline. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdia/pr/arizona-woman-sentenced-six-years-prison-conspiracy-damage-dako ta-access-pipeline

2

The emerging pattern is one where, on one hand, law enforcement may resort to violence, even up to fatal force, while, on the other hand, protestors face indictment for merely occupying treehouses. To the extent that protestors are charged with violence, the arrest warrants from December and January show that these revolve around acts such as "throwing rocks" and, in a single instance, possessing a weapon.12 All of this is being justified within the framework of "terrorism" and the associations it carries, shaped by the decades-long "war on terror."

This report, authored by a media studies scholar, sheds light on how six leading U.S. national newspapers, as well as a local newspaper, covered the arrests of 42 activists on the grounds of “domestic terrorism” from December 2022 to March 2023. To date, the majority of terrorism arrests in Georgia took place during this period. Since then, Georgia’s Attorney General has used racketeering charges against protestors and their supporters with five additional people being charged as domestic terrorists.13

Previous research has shown that the mainstream media’s framing of terrorism influences public opinion and shapes support or opposition to policies such as Georgia's 2017 terrorism law.14 In any well-functioning democracy, it is vital for the media to ask critical questions, provide accurate information, and hold the government accountable for its actions. This report shows that the media coverage of Cop City had a mixed track record in doing so, with some outlets acting as spokespeople for government officials, labeling protestors as violent “terrorists,” while other outlets provided more balanced, accurate coverage.

We analyzed articles from six widely circulated national newspapers in the United States: The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, New York Post, and The Wall Street Journal. Additionally, we incorporated Georgia’s The Atlanta Journal-Constitution to provide a local perspective.

Media coverage of terrorism-related arrests in Atlanta largely fell into two distinct camps based on the portrayal of the protestors:

1. Protestors as Violent: Media frames that emphasize violence, property destruction, or depict protestors as imminent threats tend to rationalize terrorism-related arrests. This framing often aligns with the government's perspective justifying these

12 Clerk of Superior Court DeKalb County. (2022, December 15). Arrest Warrants. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23587689-dtwarrantscombined_redacted
13 The Associate Press. (2023, September 5). 61 indicted on racketeering charges in Georgia in ‘Stop Cop City’ movement. NBC News.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/61-indicted-racketeering-charges-georgia-stop-cop-city-movemen t-rcna103561
14 Norris, P.; Kern, M.; Just, M. (2004). Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public. Routledge.https://www.routledge.com/Framing-Terrorism-The-News-Media-the-Government-and-the-Public/Norris-Ke rn-Just/p/book/9780415947190

3

arrests as essential to maintaining public safety and order. Government sources tend to dominate while the voices of protestors and their supporters are largely sidelined. For example, the New York Post had almost twice as many quotes from government sources as from protestors. To the extent that protestors and their supporters are quoted, these quotes were cherry picked to present them in a negative light. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution began this way and had no interviews with protestors during the first round of terrorism arrests in December 2022. The CEO of its parent company Cox, had chaired the fund-raising campaign for Cop City raising $60 million.15 And while the paper claims to be independent from Cox, it effectively became the propaganda arm of the Atlanta Police Foundation. However, by March 2023, in the context of growing national and international support for the Stop Cop City movement, there were more quotes from those opposed to Cop City than in support.

2. Protestors as Concerned Activists: Media frames that humanize protestors, explore their motivations, and consider the viewpoints of their supporters generally result in a more critical stance regarding the utilization of terrorism legislation. This framing raises questions about the legitimacy of such charges, challenges government actions, and encourages contemplation of whether they are truly warranted. Moreover, it fosters empathy and comprehension of the protestors' goals and concerns. Quotes from protestors and their supporters are given adequate space even while government sources are cited. For instance, The Washington Post has generally included twice as many quotes from those opposed to Cop City as from government officials.

The frames used by various media outlets hold substantial sway over public perceptions of terrorism laws, significantly influencing how these laws are interpreted and implemented.

Even though the “war on terror” is supposedly over now that the U.S. has withdrawn from Afghanistan and ended the “forever wars,” U.S. federal and state governments continue to use and even expand punitive measures targeting those within the U.S. who they label as “terrorists.” The U.S. mainstream media sometimes supports this expansion, and in doing so imperils U.S. democracy. All of this is part of the legacy of the post-9/11 wars…

Rest of the paper at https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/2023/Cop%20City%20and%20Terrorism_.pdf

You want to know who is destroying our world and our future?

Look no further - ExxonMobil, Koch Industries and Marathon Petroleum, as well as Canadian companies Enbridge and TC Energy (Trans Canada). Bribing our officials so they can pollute and make money - nothing else matters to them. They are notorious liars and climate change deniers. In fact they set the environment where activists are longer safe to express their protests throughout the world…

This year has marked a further blow to the constitutional right to protest in the US, starting with the fatal police shooting [ruled homicide by medical examiner with 57 gun shot wounds] of forest protector and anti-Cop City activist Manuel Esteban Paez Terán in Atlanta in January 2023. It was the first case in US history of police killing an environmental activist while protesting.

Human rights for all [or not at all?] - that should be the guiding principle

Facts rarely figure into politics. Politics is governed by political ambition in the quest for money and power without a moral core. After all humans are involved. The word freedom fighter or guerrilla has been replaced by the word terrorism - this is mostly done to justify wars/agendas - let’s remember terrorism [violent action for political purposes:] is on all sides. Don’t forget Nelson Mandela was a terrorist, so was Menachim Begin and Yasser Arafat and many more including Yigal Amir… No matter - here is an article that is meant as food for thought in the avalanche of political agendas disguised as journalism by most media outlets. A fly has more integrity than most politicians and journalists… sorry to write this but true.

Personally, there will never be human rights until we treat animals as sentient beings and treat them with dignity and respect. From that will grow the betterment of humanity and rights for all living beings. A utopian fantasy perhaps but without hope… and no, religion is definitely not the answer.

I will post what is legally permitted without breaking copyright, the rest can be found on the Guardian’s website - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/11/israel-palestine-war-biden-zelenskiy

Written by: Moustafa Bayoumi is the author of the award-winning books How Does It Feel to Be a Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America and This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. He is a professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York. He is a contributing opinion writer at the Guardian US

I always dread watching US news coverage of wars, and now is no exception. After Hamas’s deadly attacks in Israel and Israel’s hellish bombardment of Gaza, I checked in on MSNBC. Before long, I heard one of their reporters talk about “the violent history between these two nations” – as if Palestine were a country – and had to turn off the TV to get a break. Palestine is not a country. That’s the whole point.

Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and Israel all live under various regimes of organized discrimination and oppression, much of which makes life nearly unlivable, and if the US media can’t even frame the issue correctly, what use is there in even covering it?

It’s not just laziness either. The reflexive identification with Israel, by both US media professionals and politicians, always obscures the fuller picture of what’s happening between Israel and the Palestinians.On 7 October, the national security council spokesperson Adrienne Watson stated that the US “unequivocally condemns the unprovoked attacks by Hamas terrorists against Israeli civilians”. Every one of us must stand up and denounce the killing of every civilian, Israeli or Palestinian or otherwise. But Watson’s use of the word “unprovoked” is doing a lot of work here.

What exactly counts as a provocation? Not, apparently, the large number of settlers, more than 800 by one media account, who stormed al-Aqsa mosque on 5 October. Not the 248 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces or settlers between 1 January and 4 October of this year. Not the denial of Palestinian human rights and national aspirations for decades.

One can, in fact must, see such actions as provocations without endorsing further murderous violence against civilians. But if you watched only US news, you would be likely to presume that Palestinians always act while Israel only reacts. You might even think that Palestinians are the ones colonizing the land of Israel, no less. And you probably believe that Israel, which holds ultimate control over the lives of 5 million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and yet denies them the right to vote in Israeli elections, is a democracy.

To be considered a political being you must at the very least be considered a human being. Who gets to count as human? “I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly,” Israel’s defense minister Yoav Gallant said. Human animals? How can such language and an announced policy of collective punishment against all the residents of Gaza be seen by Israel’s supporters in the United States or elsewhere as defensible? Let’s be clear: Gallant’s language is not the rhetoric of deterrence. It’s the language of genocide.

There’s the nagging hypocrisy of the war in Ukraine. So many around the world support Ukraine’s resistance to foreign occupation (as they should) but blithely deny Palestinians any way to resist their occupation. Even non-violent methods of resistance like the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign is vilified and even criminalized. Why the double standard? Unsurprisingly, such stances go all the way to the top. The Ukraine president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, has twice voiced unilateral support for Israel in recent days, saying that “Israel’s right to self-defense is unquestionable”. Would he say the same for Russia on his territory? Of course not. Zelenskiy ought to see how his invaded and occupied land is more akin to the situation of the Palestinians than the Israelis. The obfuscations are everywhere.

The rest can be read at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/11/israel-palestine-war-biden-zelenskiy

 

 

 

 

You should ask yourself what is wrong with you when you can do this

to creatures who have the emotional intelligence of young children. But as long as you torture animals for your “food” and entertainment you certainly cannot complain about being mistreated yourself. Human rights and human liberation require animal rights and animal liberation. One cannot exist without the other. Human and animal rights for all. You want peace? You want an idyllic world? You are the problem and as long as you do this you too are subject to violence and murder by your fellow man. Logic dictates that as long as man is cruel to animals he is cruel to other humans.

Praise to the brave people fighting and dying for the animals and the environment.

The answer is to be vegan - full stop, period.

Why we are screwed - Exxon posts record $56bn profit for 2022 in historic high for western oil industry

Is there anything else to write? Perhaps we should nationalize oil? And then there is their bribing of universities - good to know I’m Number One - well UC Berkeley is… shameful what the school has become, this and the torture layer John Yoo…

The face of evil, corporate greed and liar-in-chief - Darren Woods - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darren_Woods

An article about him lying to congress.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/28/exxon-ceo-accused-lying-climate-science-congressional-panel

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2023/mar/27/fossil-fuel-firms-us-universities-colonize-academia

The Face of suffering - the evil men do

Broken

Broken

Dog fighters and animal abusers – what a bunch of assholes. You know like Michael Vick, the dick, and his enablers like fucking Nike and the god-damned Eagles. I seem to recall Obama said something about the dog-fighting asshole… “President Obama has voiced his approval of the second chance Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Michael Vick is getting this season, just a year removed from serving 18 months in federal prison on charges related to a dog fighting ring.” (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-lauds-michael-vicks-second-chance/ ) 44 displeased me with his support for Vick (I salute Colin Kaepernick – that’s a QB I can support). And I will tell you why – Atticus the wonderful big pitbull whom I loved in his short life was an abused dog. Not by Vick but by men of his ilk. I wonder how Obama would feel if his dog had been abused? Atticus did not get a second chance.

Atticus was wonderful with his soft velvety skin, a beautiful creature with sad, soulful eyes, his worried demeanor, even his cowering in the corner or bathroom – afraid of men – I miss everything about him dearly. You see the 90-pound Atticus was abused, eventually thrown out of a car or truck, and finally adopted by a couple in LA for three years. Sadly the wife died of cancer and the husband, also suffering from a deadly disease, could no longer take care of Atticus.

My best friend stepped in and adopted Atticus in January 2019 even though Atticus too was diagnosed with a shitty cancer that ultimately would be the cause of his untimely death. They expected a year I seem to recall and he did not even get that. Atticus was a fearful giant – so horribly abused that his personality was shattered beyond repair. There were glimmers of kindness, a gentleness within, but still fear was an overriding issue for him.

Atticus

Atticus

I dog sat him twice for long periods of time along with his brother and sister… I hand-fed him a few times but mostly I gave him his bowl of food in the bathroom from where he could watch the activities in the living room… safe, but sad to witness. He let me hug him however – probably paralyzed by fear – but I hoped not. 

Fortunately, he had great company the last few months of his short life - a little crippled bully with way too big a personality, and a senile old grand dame Akita (probably the greatest being I have ever known) – all rescues. They made an odd team but Atticus would somehow manage to climb into the car and go for something resembling walks with his dog family. I think he was fearful every time he had to get into the car.

Atticus was amazing with the vets and the great techs. Perhaps, he knew they were there to help or maybe he just had surrendered his fate to whatever came his way. He survived his spleen removal - he had a stromal sarcoma on his spleen - but the cancer had microscopically spread to his liver, which became apparent a few months later during a follow up ultrasound of his liver.

Atticus was euthanized at his home on September 5, 2019, shortly after his Akita sister died. I was not there. I hope he knew he was loved. I miss him terribly.

IMG_7133.jpeg
IMG_7257.jpeg